Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ray, Deepshikha
- Predictors of Caregiver Burden in Primary Caregivers of Autism Spectrum Disorders
Abstract Views :198 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, IN
2 Tata Motors Hospital, Jamshedpur, IN
1 Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, IN
2 Tata Motors Hospital, Jamshedpur, IN
Source
IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, Vol 6, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 47-50Abstract
The present study attempts to explore the predictors of caregiver burden in parents of children with Autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The sample consisted of 20 parents (fathers=2; mothers=18) of individuals with ASD, with a mean age of the parents as 39.2 years (SD=8.01) and the age range of their children afflicted by ASD being 5 to 13 years. The predictors included 'Socio-Economic Status of the Caregivers'; assessed by "Socio-Economic Status Scale" by Kuppuswamy (1983); 'Age of Caregivers', 'Age of the Individual with ASD', 'Stigma of the Caregivers'; assessed on "Experience with Stigma Scale" by Werman and Schulman (2013); 'Functional status' of the individual with ASD was assessed by 'Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living' (Katz, 1983); and 'Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale' (Lawton & Brody, 1969). Care giver burden was assessed by the scale developed by Zarit et al. (1980). The results of Stepwise Multiple Regression Analysis revealed that 'Experience of Stigma' is the major predictor of'Caregiver Burden' and 63.5% of variations of score in 'Caregiver Burden' is explained by variations of score in 'Experience of Stigma'.Keywords
Caregiver Burden, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Stigmatization.
- Effect of Priming on Implicit Moral Judgement
Abstract Views :175 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Begal, IN
2 Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, IN
1 Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Begal, IN
2 Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, IN
Source
IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, Vol 6, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 55-57Abstract
The present study tries to investigate 'implicit moral reasoning' by using a priming paradigm wherein a prime can influence the categorization of a target word into two categories viz. 'morally wrong' or 'not morally wrong'. The participants comprised of healthy female young adults (age ranging from 18 to 25 years) with a minimum educational qualification of graduation in any discipline. The prime consisted of phrases (ranging from 5 to 9 words) denoting actions which are either a 'highly immoral activity' (e.g., 5 year old girl raped) or a 'highly moral activity' (e.g., girl jumps into river to save little brother). The target words had a 'non-moral' negative connotation (e.g., Distress, Illness). The prime and targets were presented with the help of a software designed for the purpose; the 'latency' of responding to the target and the 'frequency' of target being categorized into 'morally wrong' in each condition (i.e., variation of nature of prime) was measured. Statistical analysis revealed that target words (which are inherently unpleasant but without explicit moral connotation) are likely to be morally judged or categorised based on the nature of prime received by the participant (i.e., prime phrase denoting a moral activity or an immoral activity).Keywords
Priming, Moral Judgement, Reasoning.- Subliminal Priming: Its Impact on Affective Judgement
Abstract Views :197 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, IN
2 Department of Psychology, Maharani Kasiswari College, Kolkata, West Bengal, IN
1 Department of Psychology, University of Calcutta, Kolkata, West Bengal, IN
2 Department of Psychology, Maharani Kasiswari College, Kolkata, West Bengal, IN
Source
IAHRW International Journal of Social Sciences Review, Vol 8, No 1-3 (2020), Pagination: 26-30Abstract
The current research tries to unravel if primes which are not consciously perceivable can impact emotion categorization task. For this study, 101 healthy young adults (male = 38; female = 63) with mean age of males being 22.35 with an SD of 2 and that of females being 22.18 with an SD of 0.77 were made to perform a cognitive task where they had to categorize the emotion displayed by neutral faces after being primed by neutral and negative words, presented supraliminally or subliminally. A software SublimiX was used to generate subliminal stimuli and present the priming task. The neutral facial expressions were created using a software called FaceGen Modeller. General health Questionnaire (Goldberg, 1992) was administered to screen psychiatric morbidity in the participants. Results revealed an attention bias towards negative (unpleasant) stimuli.Keywords
Prime, Subliminal, Supraliminal.References
- Bareither, I., Chaumon, M., Bernasconi, F., Villringer, A., & Busch, N.A. (2014). Invisible visual stimuli elicit increases in alpha-band power. Journal of Neurophysiology, 112, 1082.
- Bargh, J.A., & Pietromonaco, P. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 437-449.
- Bower, G.H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129-148.
- Channouf, A. (2000). Subliminal exposure to facial expressions of emotion and evaluative judgments of advertising messages. European Review of Applied Psychology, 50, 19-23.
- Charles, L., Gaillard, R., Amado, I., Krebs, M. O., Bendjemaa, N., & Dehaene, S. (2017). Conscious and unconscious performance monitoring: Evidence from patients with schizophrenia. Neuroimage, 144, 153-163. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.056
- Clore, G.L., & Storbeck, J. (2006). Affect as information about liking, efficacy, and importance. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Hearts and minds: Affective influences on social cognition and behaviour (pp. 123-142). New York: Psychology Press.
- Cohen, J.D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J.L. (1990). On the control of autonomic processes: A parallel distributed processing account of the stroop effect. Psychological Review, 97, 332-361.
- Eckhardt, C.I., & Cohen, D.J. (1997). Attention to anger-relevant and irrelevant stimuli following naturalistic insult. Personality Individual Difference, 23(4), 619-629.
- Eimer, M., & Schlaghecken, F. (2003). Response facilitation and inhibition in subliminal priming. Biological Psychology, 64(12), 7-26.
- Eriksen, C.W., & Schultz, D.W. (1979). Information processing in visual search: A continuous flow conception and experimental results. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 249-263.
- Goldberg, D. (1992). General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12). Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.
- Green, D.M., & Swets, J.A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Huntington: New York: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Co.
- Greenwald, A.G., Klinger, M.R., & Liu, T.J. (1989). Unconscious processing of dichoptically masked words. Memory and Cognition, 18, 383-400.
- Hansen, H.C., & Hansen, R.D. (1994). Automatic emotion: Attention and facial efference. CA: Academic Press.
- Ionescu, M.R. (2016). Subliminal perception of complex visual stimuli. Romanian Journal of Ophthalmology, 60(4), 226-230.
- Jolij, J., & Lamme, V.A. (2005). Repression of unconscious information by conscious processing: Evidence from affective blind sight induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 10747-10751.
- Jiménez-Ortega, L., Espuny, J., de Tejada, P.H., Vargas-Rivero, C., & Martín-Loeches, M. (2017). Subliminal emotional words impact syntactic processing: Evidence from performance and event-related brain potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 192.
- Khalid, S., Finkbeiner, M., & König, P. (2013). Subcortical human face processing? Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(4), 989–1002.
- Kouider, S., & Dehaene, S. (2007). Levels of processing during non-conscious perception: A critical review of visual masking Philos. Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Science, 362, 857-875.
- Lange, C., & James, W. (1922). The emotions V1. Kessinger Publishing.
- MacLeod, C.M., & MacDonald, P.A. (2000). Inter-dimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neutral anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 383-391.
- Marcel, A.J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238-300.
- Marzouki, Y., Grainger, J., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). Exogenous spatial cueing modulates subliminal masked priming. Acta Psychologica, 126, 34-45.
- Muscarella, C., Brintazzoli, G., Gordts, S., Soetens, E., & Van den Bussche, E. (2013). Short- and long-term effects of conscious, minimally conscious and unconscious brand logos. PLoS ONE, 8, e57738.
- Naccache, L., Gaillard, R., Adam, C., Hasboun, D., Clémenceau, S., Baulac, M., Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2005). A direct intracranial record of emotions evoked by subliminal words. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 7713-7717. doi: 10.1073/pnas. 0500542102
- Öhman, A. (2002). Automaticity and the amygdala: Nonconscious responses to emotional faces. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(2), 62-66.
- Palermo, R., & Rhodes, G. (2007). Are you always on my mind? A review of how face perception and attention interact. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 75-92.
- Persuh, M., LaRock, E., & Berger, J. (2018). Working memory and consciousness: The current state of play. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, Article 78.
- Pichon, S., Guex, R., & Vuilleumier, P. (2016). Influence of temporal expectations on response priming by subliminal faces. PLoS One, 11(10), e0164613.
- Stroop, J.R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.